Video Analysis

PART ONE

Video #1 
A. Sam Adams
B. Biking
C. Didn't like where some of the objects where placed in photos, wish there was more action in some, bad lighting, photos don't look realistic
D. Liked Shadow and jay walker in 2 photos
E.  The photos were ok, some of the photos didn't do anything for me and didn't grab my attention. The subject in some of the photos were not clear to me.


Video #2
A. Justin Mott
B. Poverty
C. Wished the emotion in some could have been more grabbing, some photos had bad intentional blur, some photos were confusing and didn't know what they were looking at.
D.  Some photos had really good emotion, like how the photographer was trying new things with his photos, good composition, mood and light
E. I liked this photographer because he could really capture and tell the story of poverty in other countries and doesn't shoot the ordinary things in life.


Video #3
A. Melissa Golden
B. Old People & Make Up Day
C. Out of focus, missed important parts of photos, too much stuff in the background, distracting power lines in photos
D. Good portrait photo, captures full story in photo
E. I did not like the photographer because it took them a very long time to actually present and show their theme and story. Many photos were boring and never got any of my attention from them.


Video #4
A. Carlos Delgado
B. Hardships and Hard Times
C. Cluttered background, exposure of colors are too bright, can't see faces
D. 
E. Many photos were very cluttered with items in the background or foreground. Levels of composition in colored photos were too bright. Many items in photo seemed unrealistic.


2A. Nice color composition, photographer seems to be doing activities along with the people in the photos. very creative

2B. I liked how the photographer really got into the action and wasn't afraid to get dirty. He made the viewers feel like they are in that moment and experiencing that time in the past.

3A. The looked at the story line and if the photographer followed their story or if the story was easily noticeable. They also looked to see if the portfolio was put together nicely and flows with the story. Along with that they made sure no photos were fillers to make the portfolio seem really long.

PART TWO 

1. I agree witht he judges when they chose the rugby photo first in the action category. The emotion in the photo makes the view want to know what happened afterwards and cringe. And it is something that wasn't planned to happen, which makes it that much hard to capture.

2. I did not agree with the women being attacked by the goose. The photo didn't make me feel anything and didn't make me want to look at it many different times. The sumo wrestler should have been first because there was line sin the photo from the escalator and also had emotion from other people in the photo. And it made me want to know more about the story and makes me have a lot of questions about the situation.